Non-Commodity Content: The Framework B2B Teams Need in 2026

What is non-commodity content?

Non-commodity content is content that can't be reproduced by a competitor or an AI, because it's built from raw material only you have: your data, your customer conversations, your failures. Google's guide to AI features in Search ranks it above every other recommendation. If a page could be generated from public information alone, it's commodity content.

Commodity vs non-commodity content

The distinction sounds abstract until you put two pages side by side.

How much published content is commodity? Scores from 289 pages

I run a free Non-Commodity Content Checker that scores a page on the five dimensions described further down. Between 25 April and 14 September 2026 it scored 289 distinct published URLs across 108 websites. Pasted drafts and pages on baba-seo.com are left out.

79% of published pages sit in the two commodity bands: 41.2% score as commodity (0-4 out of 15) and 38.1% as mostly commodity (5-8). 13.1% are differentiated (9-11) and 7.6% definitive (12-15). The average score is 5.9.

Viewpoint and stakes are where pages fail. 73% of pages score zero on viewpoint and 63% score zero on stakes. Only 18% score zero on specificity. Most pages include specifics and still take no position.

Length barely helps. Pages under 1,500 words average 5.0; pages of 2,500 to 3,999 words average 6.5. Every length group stays in the mostly commodity band, and the correlation between word count and score is 0.05.

Rewrites move the score. 53 URLs were scored, edited, and scored again. Their average went from 5.6 to 7.8. 29 gained two points or more; 4 lost two or more.

Two limits on these numbers. The pages are self-selected: people test the content they are unsure about, which may pull scores down. And the scorer is a language model that can move by about one point on identical text. Neither changes the headline: if every page scored one point higher, 73% would still sit in the commodity bands.

Your rankings held. Your clicks vanished. Here's why.

If you run SEO for a B2B company, you've probably watched this happen in your last quarter's data. Your commercial pages still rank where they used to. Some of them rank slightly better. The clicks are gone anyway.

I work with two B2B companies where this happened across Q1 2026 in different categories. One a Dutch SME lender, one a B2B equipment company in workplace water. The pattern is identical.

Rankings: holding or improving by ~2 positions on average.
CTR: down 35-72% across the commercial page set.

The lender's flagship commercial page held position 1 organically on a key category query while losing 62% of its clicks. The equipment company watched their highest-CPC commercial keyword (€19+ CPC, real money) sit at position 30. Not because they couldn't rank, but because what was ranking was the wrong page.

This is not a Core Update story. Their pages didn't get demoted. The SERP got rearranged around them.

Most SEO advice for this moment is wrong. "Update your content," "add EEAT signals," "use more AI for scale." None of those address the actual mechanism.

If your non-brand commercial pages dropped more than 30% in clicks this quarter while rankings held, your content is being read as commodity. This will not reverse with optimization tweaks. It reverses only with a different kind of content.

‍

What Google says about non-commodity content

Google's guide to optimizing for generative AI features in Search (last updated 10 July 2026) opens its recommendations with "Create valuable, non-commodity content for your audience" and says it "will likely influence your website's presence in generative AI search in the long run more than any of the other suggestions in this guide."

The guide draws the line with two titles. Commodity content, such as "7 Tips for First-Time Homebuyers", "is often based on common knowledge, which could originate from anyone, and typically adds little unique insight for readers." Non-commodity content, such as "Why We Waived the Inspection & Saved Money: A Look Inside the Sewer Line", "provides unique expert or experienced takes that go beyond common knowledge and the ordinary."

Danny Sullivan presented the same framing at Search Central Live in Toronto in April 2026. Two slides matter.

Slide 1: "Good Non-Commodity content is"

‍

• Unique: brings a viewpoint, information or has content that others lack or can't easily replicate
• Specific: talks about a specific instance, situation or thing, not general rules, steps or generic information
• Authentic: demonstrates first-hand knowledge or experience

‍

Slide 2: Commodity vs Non-Commodity

The slide compared real categories. A running store's "Top 10 Things to Consider When Buying Running Shoes" is commodity. A running store's "Why This Customer's Shoes Collapsed After 400 Miles: A Wear Pattern Analysis" is non-commodity. Same category, same expertise, totally different content.

What Danny Sullivan didn't say but every B2B operator should hear: "unique" doesn't mean "a different angle on the same information." It means information no one else has access to.

In the same event, Google confirmed that high-volume AI-generated content is now treated as scaled content abuse. Commodity content isn't just being ignored. It's being penalized.

‍

Why commodity content stopped working in 2026 specifically

Most readers know AI Overviews exist. Few have connected the mechanism cleanly to commodity content collapse.

AI Overviews can assemble an answer for a generic commercial query from eight commodity sources without needing any single one specifically. The Dutch lender I mentioned: their flagship product page on a category query showed an AI Overview citing eight competitors zero times. Not "ranked low." Not cited. The AIO didn't need them.

Same companies on a more specific query — one tied to a named customer story or a first-hand decision — the AIO either cites them or doesn't render at all. The content that survives is the content the AIO can't compress without losing meaning.

This is the actual mechanism. AI Overviews are a commodity-content compressor. They take eight average pages saying the same thing and produce a summary that no single page beats. The pages keep their rankings. The clicks go to the summary instead.

This isn't a Google update you adapt to with tactics. The economics of commodity content have permanently changed. Pages that used to lose 20% CTR to featured snippets now lose 40-60% to AI Overviews. The losses compound with each update.

The B2B equipment company's data shows the same pattern from a different angle. They have 199 ranked non-brand keywords. Only 21 carry commercial intent. The other 178 are informational queries — "best XYZ in the world," that kind of thing — where they show up but no one buys. AI Overviews ate the informational queries first, because those are the most commodity-shaped. The commercial queries followed.

So what is non-commodity content, specifically? Five dimensions.

‍

The five dimensions of non-commodity content

Google's "unique, specific, authentic" framing is directionally right but too vague to audit against. The way I think about it for B2B content is five dimensions, each scored 0-3.

A page scoring 0-4 is commodity. 5-8 is mostly commodity. 9-11 is differentiated. 12-15 is the kind of content other people cite.

Most B2B content sits between these two extremes. It cites real sources and uses real numbers — which feels rigorous — and still scores in the 5-8 range because it lacks first-hand stakes. The author is summarizing and explaining, not committing. That's the most common failure mode in the cluster, and the hardest to spot from inside.

If your content is commodity, here's the first three moves

Diagnosing commodity is easier than fixing it. The fix isn't tactical — it's organizational. Three moves, in order.

‍

1. Audit your worst-bleeding page first, not your best-performing one.

Use the Non-Commodity Content Checker. The pages that lost the most clicks while keeping rankings are your highest-leverage rebuilds. They have proven search demand. The only thing missing is non-commodity material. Score them against the five dimensions. The dimension scoring zero is where you start.

Most teams do this backwards. They optimize the page already winning and ignore the page bleeding. Bleeding pages are gold — Google still ranks them, the audience is there, the conversion mechanism has just been removed by the SERP rearranging around them.

‍

2. Build a sourcing pipeline before you write.

Non-commodity content needs raw material that doesn't exist in training data. From the lender's playbook: one customer interview per month, signed permission, specific usage data, two or three photos. One interview per month fuels a year of non-commodity pages.

The organizational lift of capturing that material is bigger than the writing itself. This is the part most content teams skip and then wonder why their non-commodity pages still feel generic. The writing isn't the problem. The inputs are.

‍

3. Stop publishing anything that fails the test.

The equipment company killed 30+ commodity blog posts in Q1 to free up their content lead's time for two strategic priorities: rebuilding the highest-CPC commercial page and writing two new commercial pages where none existed. Volume-as-floor was a 2024 strategy. In 2026, every piece must answer: "what does this company know that a competitor doesn't?"

If a piece can't answer that, it doesn't enter the pipeline. The hardest part of this move is cultural — "we publish two pieces a week" is easy to defend internally; "we publish two pieces a month, all of which would survive an LLM rewriting them" is harder to defend until the data starts vindicating it.

Closing

Commodity content is being dislocated by AI Overviews. Non-commodity content is the only thing that survives. The five-dimension rubric is how you tell the difference, page by page, before Google does it for you.

Two final notes.

The rubric isn't static. I recalibrate the scoring prompts when a dimension drifts, and a single page can move by a point between runs. Treat any score as directional, not final.

And if you're reading this thinking your content is commodity, that's the right starting place. Most B2B content is. The companies that move first on rebuilding to the non-commodity standard will be the ones still ranking — and earning clicks — in 2027.

Want the shorter, symptom-first version of this argument? Start with why your B2B content stopped earning clicks. And if you want a second pair of eyes on where your library sits, scoring pages against this rubric is how my B2B SEO consulting engagements usually start — the HealthTech client story shows what rebuilding to this standard did to conversions.